2015-03-19 18:23 GMT+04:00 Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>:

> On Thursday 19 March 2015 15:05:38 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > 2015-03-19 8:42 GMT+04:00 Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>:
> > > On Thursday 19 March 2015 04:54:09 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > > > Hi guys.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think about moving gif and ico plugins from qtbase
> > > > to qtimageformats?
> > >
> > > Why? What's the reason?
> >
> > Well, we have a separate module for non-mandatory image format plugins -
> so
> > why not having them in a single place?
>
> Your premise is incorrect. It's not about non-mandatory.
>
> So, what's the reason we should do it?
>

I didn't say we *should* do it. Simply asking for opinions.

There is no any single .ico file in qtbase (except of ones in
qicoimageformat auto-test) and we don't support -no-ico/-qt-ico/-plugin-ico
configure options, which makes it a good candidate.
There is also just a single .gif file in widgets/movie example, though we
support -no-gif configure option and widgets/movie example never checks if
gif format is really supported.
^ So why bloating qtbase?

Regards,
Konstantin
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to