On 8 April 2015 at 17:35, Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 04:39:52PM +0200, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: >> On Wednesday, April 08, 2015 04:30:23 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> so ideally we find the perfect new name for both module and >> repository. Sadly we didn't manage to come up with a great name in a >> few hours of brain storming. >> > i think quick controls 2 will work just fine. it's not like people are > not used to "asynchronous" versioning in the qt quick world. > > but anyway, here are some more ideas: > - the classic: qt quick controls NG > - the diet: qt quick controls light > - the thesaurus: qt quick widgets > - the cynic: qt quicker controls
I like QtQuick.LightControls. In general, since both sets are drastically different (in way they look like, in the way they perform, in styling capabilities, etc.) I do not think giving them similar names (Controls 1 and Controls 2) is a good idea - it may strongly confuse the users. Not everybody follows the mailing list and blog, so if you name them similarly you can expect a flood of questions like "I'm trying to use the new Controls, but X does not work, and Y looks different, while Z can't read my style definition" etc. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
