On 15-4-2015 18:44, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > The second form would thus save the value <-> QVariant comparison and > not much else. The third form however eliminates the string look-up > entirely by having the user provide both the backing member variable > *and* what to do when a change should be emitted. (I'd expect this to > be the change signal most of the time, but taking a functor adds the > flexibility of allowing users to do other things if needed.) Right, of course. That may be useful indeed. Thank you for your feedback, it is apreciated!
André _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
