Hi, Compilation wise I agree, it's low effort. But the situation is different in Jira IMO.
Simon Original Message From: Thiago Macieira Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 17:37 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Development] Future of Qt Quick 1 in Qt 5 On Friday 08 May 2015 14:39:38 Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > Since KDE moved over the Plasma desktop to Qt Quick 2 (on which I'm writing > this email), I feel confident that the time has come to move everyone over. > For the no opengl acceleration use case, we provide the Qt Quick 2D Renderer > as backend. > (https://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/01/22/introducing-the-qt-quick-2d-renderer/) > > In short, is there any reason not to remove Qt Quick 1 from Qt 5.6? Do we need to do anything at all? How much effort is keeping Qt Quick 1 compiling these days? We're not doing anything besides that, are we? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
