On Tuesday 19 May 2015 00:20:43 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Koehne Kai wrote: > >> One thing to worry about though is Linux distributions: We certainly > >> don't want to let them stick to an old Qt version because there are > >> applications still depending on qtquick1. However, a quick search with > >> e.g. osc for openSUSE shows that this shouldn't be a big problem > > > >> (somebody please correct me if I did the search wrong): > > What we will likely do is ship QtQuick1 from the last Qt 5.x that shipped > > it, along with a current Qt 5.y where y>x. And we (or more likely our > > users) will blame you for any breakage caused by that mix. > > Don't forget to patch the cmake files. > > Those require all Qt versions to be the same (unless you do a Pre-Order > traversal of the dependency tree).
Any way we can fix that in the actual source code? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
