On Wednesday 20 May 2015 11:28:26 Knoll Lars wrote: > >So do we maintain binary compatibility for testlib? > > I don’t see a strong use case for staying binary compatible with testlib.
There is one use-case, which is to run regression tests without recompiling the unit test. All the tests that don't require "private_tests" were meant to be simply run with a new version of Qt. Maybe we can have an intermediate solution of keeping BC with the previous minor release only. If you stop using a function in version 5.N, you can remove it in 5.N+1. Would this work? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
