On Monday 15 June 2015 13:01:04 Sean Harmer wrote: > * The existing syncqt.pl works
syncqt actually has support for namespaces so you could #include <NS/Class> but I think it's disabled since it has some bugs and nothing is using it. We could re-enable it. Note that the namespace should not be the same as the module name. If we're going to use the module name, we should simply make qdoc stop suggesting #include <Class> for this module and qmake not add -I$QTDIR/include/Module. That way, people have to #include <QtModule/Class> and there would be no clash. > * Code written with a using directive still looks like Qt code That's their problem. > Although we could recommend people to not use using directives we can't > enforce it (nor should we) so the expense of the single repeated Q > seemed like the least onerous option. Not ideal, but a compromise from > the other options. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
