On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Thiago Macieira
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Qt 5.5 would be ideal - but we'd need to support the old Qt CI system for
> longer. So we're targetting that *Qt 5.6* will be the first LTS release.

Mind to elaborate? Why is the "old Qt CI" a requirement or a blocker
for a LTS release?

In general: I don't feel comfortable with the idea of introducing
C++11 in our API, dropping support for a bunch of platforms, and make
/that/ a LTS release...

-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to