On Tuesday 23 June 2015 22:01:27 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Tuesday 23 June 2015 18:47:47 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > > Random thought: call it Qt 6? :-P > > Let's not.
I agree. Qt 5 required full C++98 support, IMO, Qt 6 should require full C++11 support, maybe C++14, and that's still far, far away. How wrong I was believing Herb Sutter @ GoingNative 2012 about MSVC picking up the pace... -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
