On Monday 29 June 2015 22:51:25 Ansel Sermersheim wrote: > I would like to clarify, we did not use anything from the Woboq blog > posting as others have speculated. We had moc removed from CopperSpice > a year earlier than the release of this blog. We are also not > associated with the Trinity Project.
Out of curiosity: You've removed moc, but what's your replacement for rcc? > We would like to encourage developers to attend CPPCon to learn about Maybe Meeting C++ will get better luck. Most of the Qt developers live in Europe. I encourage you to submit your session there. By the way, you're also welcome to discuss your ideas in this mailing list. We're not against new C++ techniques, but we want to support existing deployments, so we have to be a little more pragmatic on our choices. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
