Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>
> On Tuesday 21 July 2015 16:14:18 Bubke Marco wrote:
> > Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>
> >
> > > > > Or like QString and QByteArray will be in Qt 6.
> > > >
> > > > Are these still implicitly shared?
> > >
> > > Yes, in large mode. In small string/array mode, they wouldn't share, of
> > > course.
> >
> > What about the conversion of std::vector to QVector and back. Do we get zero
> > copy conversion?
> 
> Can't be done.

What about wrapping QVector around std::vector. In that case std::vector could 
be
used in the internal implementation and application code. Interface would be 
still
using QVector. Many developers I met who rejected Qt cited the argument what Qt 
is a 
closed island and not very operable with code which is using the standard 
library.
What have made Qt productive 20 years ago is maybe not a good advice for the
future.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to