On Tuesday 21 July 2015 18:11:20 Daniel Teske wrote: > I wonder why Marc Mutz didn't fell the need to update the mailing list on > his changed opinion and this fix.
Read the whole mail you're replying to, and the follow-ups: On Monday 29 June 2015 17:50:31 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday 29 June 2015 17:14:57 Marc Mutz wrote: > > So, it doubles the number of dtor calls, and it pessimises all code > > around it. I am not prepared to make that pessimisation for out-of-line > > types. People who use std::move can imo be bothered to clear the > > moved-from object after the move in those miniscule fraction of cases > > where that actually matters. Forcing people to use swap (if, indeed, > > they can, because swap() doesn't bind to rvalues on the rhs) for the > > common case is bad api design. > > I agree with Marc here. [...] > > For inline types, see https://codereview.qt-project.org/115376 Nobody spoke up again, so that's what I implemented and announced in the [ChangeLog] here: https://codereview.qt-project.org/120771 Are we going to announce every API change on the ML now? Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <[email protected]> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
