On Tuesday 21 July 2015 18:32:09 Ansel Sermersheim wrote: > On 7/21/15 6:23 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Right, we usually work around this by having QMap<CaseInsensitiveString, > > X>. > Certainly possible to do, but sometimes quite awkward depending on the > situation.
Agreed. > > I don't see the need to do the same for QHash. How often do people need a > > different comparator and/or a different hashing function for a given class > > type? > I have in the past used non-standard hashing and equality functions for > std::unordered_map, but I will admit it is far less common. Can you share why you needed that? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
