On Friday 31 July 2015 09:48:08 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > well, that recommendation is reasonable in face of the status quo, but > i think we should (and could) do a better job at preserving nullness. > there are only a handful of cases where the choice is arbitrary, and we > can clearly document them.
In this particular case, it was reasoned that the API was inconsistent and broken. So the behaviour was changed intentionally. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
