Hi,
In order to see in which version they will be included, you need to check on
each bug its "Fix/Version(s)" label.QTBUG-44337 is still not closed yet, I'm
waiting for some folks to reply (check
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/120725/ ).
I didn't had time to check QProgressDialog bug. I'm afraid I'll not have soon
because this bug has a low priority on my list ...
Cheers,BogDan.
On Monday, August 3, 2015 9:04 AM, Robert Iakobashvili
<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear BogDan,
Thank you for the 2 regressions being fixed.
Should the fixes appear in 5.5.1?
Sorry to bother you but it seems that the issue with QProgressDialog
wasn't treated:
QTBUG-47049
[REG 5.4 -> 5.5] QProgressDialog is Shown Immediately After Allocation
and Even Despite hide() Call.
Thank you.
Regards,
Robert
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Robert Iakobashvili
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, BogDan.
>
> QTBUG-47049
>
> [REG 5.4 -> 5.5] QProgressDialog is Shown Immediately After Allocation
> and Even Despite hide() Call.
>
>
> Regards,
> Robert
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 10:31 AM, BogDan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 1 & 2. I can reproduce it, I'll try to fix it soon (though it will be quite
>> hard to make them look good on Android).
>> 3. Yep, please create a bug report.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> BogDan.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, July 6, 2015 9:50 AM, Robert Iakobashvili <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Trying Qt-5.5 for Android, the following regressions since
>> Qt-5.3 are still inside and break it:
>>
>> 1. QTBUG-44337 -
>>
>> [REG 5.3-5.4] Android: QFileDialog for Save Keeps Save Button Disabled
>> until the filename contains a dot
>>
>> 2. QTBUG-44271 -
>>
>> [REG 5.3 -> 5.4] Android: QFontComboBox Broken
>>
>>
>> and even worse:
>>
>> 3. QProgressDialog instances are shown immediately on allocation
>> and even explicit hide is not helping (Android 4.4.2, Nexus-7-2013)
>> This is a regression since 5.4
>>
>> Does anybody cares? If yes, I will open the issue.
>>
>>
>> In Qt-5.3.1 all the above was working properly.
>>
>> IMHO, Qt for iOS and Android requires serious "go for stability"
>> instead the current run for more and fancy features.
>>
>> Still, it might be that my visibility is limited and other people
>> do not feel so or sales consideration require more features ASAP
>> and do not care the quality.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Robert
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
