Yeah, replacing would be better than just removing... On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Hausmann Simon < [email protected]> wrote:
> I think that there is a big difference between it being easy enough to > find reading material and us - the project - making specific > recommendations for material that we think is of particularly high quality > and perhaps also relevance. The latter adds real value to our documentation. > > I think that if there is evidence that the currently suggested material is > not suitable anymore, then it would be great to replace it with another > recommendation. > > Simon > > Original Message > From: Sze Howe Koh > Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 09:49 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Development] Documentation proposal: Remove recommended reading > list of 20-year-old books > > > Hi all, > > http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/threads.html#recommended-reading points readers > to some books about multithreading. These books were published between > 1995 and 1997, and have been well and truly superseded by newer ones. > > Rather than update the list, I plan to remove it completely. I don't > think this list belongs in the Qt docs, just like how we don't > maintain a list of "learning C++" books. It's easy enough these days > to find reading material for these foundational topics. > > Any objections? > > > Regards, > Sze-Howe > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
