On 13/10/15 12:22, "Oswald Buddenhagen" <oswald.buddenha...@theqtcompany.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:52:54AM +0000, Knoll Lars wrote: >> The only one I could see that could make sense in an existing repo is >>the >> dbus qml integration, but then again, this one can’t live in qtbase >>where >> the rest of the dbus code lives. So it’s either a separate repo, or we >>add >> it to the qtdeclarative repo. >> >yeah, i had the same thoughts. > >ideally, it would be qt/qtdbus, but carving qtdbus out of qtbase would >imply carving out some stuff that depends on it as well, so it might be >a bit unrealistic, especially on short notice. it's something we should >probably work towards, though. thiago may have some input ... ;) Yes, currently this is pretty difficult to do. Bearer management and the xcb backend do for example depend on dbus. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
