On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:30:10PM +0100, Marc Mutz wrote: > On Friday 04 December 2015 14:32:22 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > But auto is still staticaly typed. > > > > > > > that's why using a scripting language as a source of arguments wasn't a > > very wise move tactically, even as an aside. ;) > > I, indeed, did not anticipate that anyone here would be able to seriously > confuse static typing and var/auto, the omitting of the type name in variable > declarations. > it's not that anyone is confused, it's that your "aside" was inherently flawed: variables in python are dynamically typed, so the suggestion that they are "auto" in any way related to c++ makes no sense whatsoever. my response aimed merely at showing that even your little "joke" was off.
> I have the feeling I wasn't wrong, though. > ??? _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
