Hi, thanks for answering, but > Am 17.01.2016 um 20:36 schrieb Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>: > > On Sunday 17 January 2016 19:13:44 Gunnar Roth wrote: >> Hi, >> I saw quite some changes like https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/145961/ >> <https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/145961/> Replace QStringLiteral >> with QLatin1String in QFileSelector. I also read about the problem of >> QStringLiteral concerning plugins, but what is the idea behind these >> changes ? > > QLatin1String is more efficient if you're calling a method that has a > QLatin1String overload, like most methods in QString itself. > why is QLatin1String more efficient than QLiteralString in this case? both strings being uft16 seems to be faster for, you could use size_t chunks for comparison for example.
Regards, Gunnar
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
