Marc Mutz wrote:
> I'm not saying we don't need new API should we replace QThread with
> std::thead. I'm saying that all the hard, impressive, work is already
> done. It seems to be mostly a question of API now.
It shall be noted that QThread has backends for both POSIX threads
(pthreads) and Win32 threads, whereas (last I checked) at least GCC's
libstdc++ supports only POSIX threads for std::thread, so you have to use a
pthreads compatibility layer to use std::thread with MinGW.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
