On 22/02/16 19:32, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 18:16:47 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> For both WEC7 and WEC13 Qt 5.6 should be a very good release to use, while >> for WEC13 also Qt 5.7 is an option. However as Qt 5.6 is a LTS release >> supporting both WEC7 and WEC13, it is a very good baseline. With Qt 5.6.0 >> the WEC13 is still experimental, but target is to have it supported equally >> well as WEC7 is within Qt 5.6.x patch level releases. > >So, to echo what Gunnar is saying: > >Is Qt 5.7 going to be the *only* release to support WEC2013? > >I want that answer to be "no". Let's support it for at least a year. I can see the reasoning here, just as well as I see the reasoning of the people that would like to get rid of VS2012 as quickly as possible. Before we continue this, could someone check the claim made in https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg154234.aspx ? That article has been published after we last discussed the topic. Thanks, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
