On Monday 29 of February 2016 11:11:28 Иван Комиссаров wrote: > 2016-02-26 11:43 GMT+03:00 Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowa...@theqtcompany.com > > On Thursday 25 of February 2016 19:22:55 Milian Wolff wrote: > > > > The thought evolved over last months and now I think that QAIM should not > > be > > QObject at all, it is just an unnecessary cost. > > Hm... Really? http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qabstractitemmodel.html#signals AFAIK, > Q_GADGET doesn't support signals
I was not explicit enough, I do not think QAIM, in the current state, is a very good API. I was thinking about new API with a similar functionality. Cheers, Jędrek _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
