On Wednesday 02 March 2016 17:59:05 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 08:52:10 PST Koehne Kai wrote:
> > Fair enough, I didn't want to imply otherwise. But I read your statement
> > as 'don't dare to use range-for unless you test with MSVC yourself',
> > which is IMO too much to ask for.
> >
> > The rule of thumb I got is "use ranged-for with curly brackets". Doesn't
> > this cover it?
>
> Maybe. Who knows, the parser is buggy!
Having introduced the most range-fors into Qt of all developers over the last
weeks, I have come across only one issue, and it's the one from the bug
report:
for ( ... : ... )
do { ... } while
As in, e.g.,
for (... : ...)
QCOMPARE(..., ...)
I think it's safe to say that range-for works as expected in so vast a
majority of cases that the CI can be used to catch the rest. Without violating
the Qt Code Formatting Guidelines and putting {} around each range-for loop
body.
Thanks,
Marc
--
Marc Mutz <[email protected]> | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
