On sexta-feira, 18 de março de 2016 10:46:41 PDT Koehne Kai wrote: > > It remains that this document is expected to be quite stable, so there > > would be some sense to having a stable URL to which we routinely copy the > > new version once a change to the source has been accepted. The effort > > involved would be minor, I must suppose. > > We'd avoid this problem if we put it into a repository that doesn't follow > the Qt branching model.
I'd say we *want* it to follow the branching model, so that we can keep it linked to the version in which it applies. Maybe I'm saying this only because of the current circumstances, as the policy for 5.6 differs quite a lot from 5.7. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
