On quarta-feira, 16 de março de 2016 20:56:42 PDT André Somers wrote: > Doesn't that lead to having the discussion twice: first once in the ML, > then again in the MR for the change?
The ML is the ultimate decider, so if we had consensus on the list, that's that. The discussion in the change may be on the wording, but not on the content. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
