Just wanted to second (third?) that.

I tried to adapt the webkit package for mxe to Qt 5.6 but ran into the known errors. Which is the "official" source package we are about to use when building webkit for/against Qt 5.6?

Regards,
Adrian

Am 19.03.2016 um 09:58 schrieb René J. V. Bertin:
Konstantin Tokarev wrote:


06.03.2016, 21:40, "Dmitry Shachnev" <[email protected]>:
Hi all,

I am currently packaging Qt 5.6 release candidate for Debian and I have
encountered some problems with QtWebKit.

1. Looks like the tarballs were build without calling syncqt. That issue was
easy to work-around and we are now calling syncqt before the build. However
it would be nice to have the final tarballs built properly.
Second that!

Can you please post the correct way to invoke syncqt? The incantations I tried
didn't change my errors :

Source/WebKit/qt/WidgetSupport/QtFallbackWebPopup.cpp:29:
Source/WebKit/qt/WidgetApi/qgraphicswebview.h:23:10: fatal error:
       'QtWebKit/qwebkitglobal.h' file not found
#include <QtWebKit/qwebkitglobal.h>
          ^
1 error generated.
make[2]: *** [.obj/WebKit/qt/WidgetApi/qwebinspector.o] Error 1


According to Thiago (20151203):
Because we decided not to. We should not even have created the 5.6 branch on
that repository, because there will be no 5.6.0 release. The changes that
landed on that branch will remain forever unreleased.

Instead, you should build this:
http://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.5/5.5.1/submodules/qtwebkit-opensource-src-5.5.1.zip
http://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.5/5.5.1/submodules/qtwebkit-opensource-src-5.5.1.tar.gz
Is that still "official"? How does one build this package against Qt 5.6.0
(preferably calling qmake and make rather than using the build script)?

Thanks,
René

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to