On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:01 PM, André Somers <[email protected]> wrote: > Are we following Sean Parent though? Because if we are, we better start > thinking about also replacing our QObject parent/child stuff with some > external forest data structure in the future...
Please, can we avoid thread derailment again? :) This is about allowing unrestricted usage of template aliases (and other C++11 features) given we're dropping MSVC2012 support. Building good APIs with those features is totally orthogonal (for instance we might simply want to use those features in the implementation). Cheers, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
