On sábado, 7 de maio de 2016 16:40:32 PDT René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hi, > > Re: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/140954/ > > Is the justification for omitting .pc files still relevant that "frameworks > are currently broken anyway"? They don't appear to be, but omitting > pkg-config files for them makes it impossible to build all dependent > software that uses pkg-config for finding Qt5. Example: poppler's Qt5 > wrapper. > > I think that's not really acceptable, especially since they again install > just fine after applying the reverse patch > (https://github.com/Homebrew/legacy-homebrew/commit/620baaf10c957875d9d2b95 > 8343456f0d35d15fc). > > Are there plans to address this issue, or should I file a bug report?
[Thread moved to dev] Frameworks with pkg-config are broken, it appears, not Qt. If you have a suggestion of what we should produce, say so. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
