On segunda-feira, 23 de maio de 2016 18:25:14 PDT Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > > Is there any good reason for these classes to not have move constructor, > > or is it just an unfortunate omission? > Because the implementation of a move constructor for those classes > requires the private class to be defined in the public header, but all > those classes are pimpl'd, so by definition you don't have that private > class available.
We couldn't implement them before Qt 5.7, but we can now. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
