Am Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2016, 05:03:28 schrieb Jani Heikkinen: > Hi! > But if there is really some reason why v5.6.1-1 don't work and v.5.6.1.1 > would work then it is really ok for me to change the tag. But let's don't > change that just because of opinions... The naming scheme for alpha, beta, rc's is <version>-<alpha/beta/rc> so the packager scripts get all confused up assuming it's non-standard and not a patch release. If 5.6.2 is impossible, please go with 5.6.1.1
> And if for some reason it was too difficult to bump everything that was > scheduled for 5.6.2 to 5.6.3, then at the very least we should have used > v5.6.1.1, which is probably what everyone making Qt packages will need to > use since a dash is completely unacceptable in release versions. Ack > > I propose that we delete the bad tag, retag and rerelease with a better > name. Ack > > Let's not make rash decisions again. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Kind regards, Ralf Nolden _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
