On 2016-06-30 06:52, Olivier Goffart wrote: > [clang-format] follows the style closely, but there are some cases > that might not be following existing practices. The question is if we > want to try to fix clang-format to be able to cope with them, or > simply adapt the coding style to fit clang-format config. > > Some of the things that are not possible with clang-format if to have all the > function in one line like we sometimes have in our headers: > > inline const QString operator+(const QString &s1, const QString &s2) > { QString t(s1); t += s2; return t; }
FWIW, I vote for fixing clang-format... because Qt is probably not the only project out there that would prefer to use such format :-). -- Matthew _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development