> -----Original Message----- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > [...] > We do not have SC promise only BC. We tend to not break SC without > reason, for example we avoid juggling with header files just to "cleanup" > stuff, but definitely we reserve right to add overloads and new functions. > That is the current state, whatever it make sense or not is a different > discussion.
We should fix https://wiki.qt.io/Qt-Version-Compatibility then. I agree though that we can't guarantee source compatibility in all cases (indirect includes are one example). We could establish a rule that methods marked with Q_SLOTS shouldn't be overloaded. Not that this would've helped, since QTimer::setInterval is not marked as a slot. Regards Kai _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
