Hi, I'd like to know what the rules are supposed to for submitting to 5.6 (LTS).
Should we enforce the strict rules of other minor releases (only regressions and P2+)? IMHO, 5.6 is not like 5.5. So with another 2+ years of 5.6 lifetime, more relaxed rules should apply. I'd like all bug-fixes to go to 5.6 first, even if the priority is not high, and regressions cannot be ruled out (they never can, anyway). I also think that dead code elimination should be in-scope for 5.6, to not construct unessesary diffs between 5.6 and dev. And last, some authors target optimisations at 5.6, some at 5.7 and others (me included, even though I sympathise with submitting to 5.6) at dev/5.8. What's the stance on this? Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <[email protected]> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
