On 05.09.2016 19:29, Marc Mutz wrote:
On Monday 05 September 2016 19:20:29 J-P Nurmi wrote:
On 05 Sep 2016, at 18:53, Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> wrote:
On Wednesday 31 August 2016 16:12:55 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
with the upcoming qtcon and my subsequent vacation, my availability will
be rather sporadic, so consider this:
- i'm not going to do reviews on a regular basis, so it's unwise to just
add me to them and expect a reaction. send me a direct mail.
- this recommendation actually applies irrespective of current plans -
sometimes i actually want to get some work done instead of just doing
reviews. ;)
- you can also ask frederik gladhorn (fregl)
generally speaking, send a complete list of change urls, as we can just
paste that into the script which performs the operation. that's also the
reason why a single mail (or irc messsage) instead of adding us to n
reviews is always preferred. please don't give verbal descriptions of
ranges - somebody has to do the click and paste orgy anyway, and that
should be you. ;)
And please, pretty please, don't _abandon_ changes and resubmit them to a
different branch. _Do_ ask Ossi or Frederik to re-target on the server,
_esp_ if you've already run into half a dozen revisions. Submitting a
new change without the ability to use inter-change diffs is just rude
towards the reviewers.
Let us move our own changes. If you're worried about abuse, downgrade any
+2 to +1 on branch change. Problem solved.
It's not about restricting what a user can do. It's simply missing
implementation, and I believe that if it were easy to implement, Ossi would
have done it long ago instead of playing retarget-monkey for the rest of us :)
Thanks,
Marc
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-268
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=117
--
Sergio Ahumada
sahum...@texla.cl
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
