On Sep 13, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Thiago Macieira 
<thiago.macie...@intel.com<mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com>> wrote:

On terça-feira, 13 de setembro de 2016 18:41:50 PDT Jake Petroules wrote:
They can and have before. Anyways, it doesn't matter. The code was unused,
untested, and was in the way of other things, so its removal is
inconsequential.

Also it caused build failure on tvOS/watchOS.

Are we sure none of our users depended on it?

I'd be blown away if they did and I can't see how there would be a dependency. 
Also using deprecated APIs is a bad idea for app store compliance. I believe 
there have been rejections for that in the past.


--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com<http://intel.com>
 Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org<mailto:Development@qt-project.org>
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

--
Jake Petroules - jake.petrou...@qt.io<mailto:jake.petrou...@qt.io>
Consulting Services Engineer - The Qt Company
Qbs build tool evangelist - qbs.io<http://qbs.io>

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to