On segunda-feira, 26 de setembro de 2016 09:31:34 PDT Simon Hausmann wrote:
> That said, this is not quite the same as changing the return type of a typed
> C++ function. QVariant is designed
> to hold any type and if you receive a QVariant it has always been a little
> dangerous to rely on specific conversion 
> behavior (throughout Qt).

Only if you didn't make the type part of your API, which is what QML had done.

See the failures:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170491

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to