> On 3 oct. 2016, at 23:09, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > > On segunda-feira, 3 de outubro de 2016 22:42:23 CEST Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >> I'd say we should at least get 5.6 and dev covered (we can then bikeshed >> on the naming -- "stable" and "dev"?). What do you think? > > Please do. That's a good idea, even if we don't have a lot of people looking > at those results, any help is good. > > I think the names should be "5.6" or "lts", the other one stays named as it > is. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Hi, I’d go for LTS, this way it’s clearer why it’s covered and doesn’t need to be changed in the future. Samuel
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
