Em quinta-feira, 3 de novembro de 2016, às 07:14:50 PDT, Charles-François Natali escreveu: > Hello, > > I'm not familiar with the Qt development process so apologies if it's not > the correct list, but I'd like to know if someone could have a look at this > issue: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-33419
This is the right list. > Basically QAbstractSocket::ShareAddress uses SO_REUSEPORT on recent-ish > Linux kernels, and unfortunately it doesn't have the same semantics as > SO_REUSEADDR, which broke several valid use cases. > > The bug report contains more details and a proposed patch. Unfortunately, non-trivial patches can't be accepted via the bugtracker. Anyway, we decided to use the SO_REUSEPORT semantic because it makes most sense with the explanation given in the documentation and with behaviour found on other platforms. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
