On lunes, 21 de noviembre de 2016 20:47:31 ART Marco Bubke wrote: > So how often do you had a BC break in stdlibc++?
Last time was with gcc5. We've got a nice big [transition] within Debian due to it. It was related to C++11 stuff, and we've got away precisely because Qt doesn't expose it. And quite messy in some concerns too because they did not increase the SONAME as they should, so the only thing we had is to track which apps/libs got rebuilt. Normally we can track this with a proper SONAME change. [transition] the required work to get stuff rebuilt against a lib changing SONAME (or breaking ABI without changing it) in the whole Debian archive and let the affected packages migrate to testing in the same go. -- The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance. http://www.devtopics.com/best-programming-jokes/ Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
