As the maintainer for the Qt Remote Objects (QtRO) playground project, I would 
like to officially request moving it from a playground project to a Qt project. 
 For now (Qt 5.9), I’d like to keep it as a Tech Preview, as there are some 
elements of the API we would still like to extend, and we’d certainly like to 
protect for changes based on additional feedback.

In a nutshell, Qt Remote Objects takes the mechanisms that Qt already provides 
for multithreaded processing (Queued connections, marshaling arguments) and 
extends them to allow QObjects to work across process and/or device boundaries. 
 It does this by allowing a Source object (with a full implementation of the Qt 
Properties, Signals and Slots) to be shared on the QtRO bus.  Replica versions 
of this object can be acquired, where QtRO handles sending any changes to the 
Source to all Replicas.  I think of the Replicas as “latent copies” of the 
original object.  This seems like a great extension to Qt, and based on 
discussions at the last Qt World Summit, one that is makes sense to have as an 
official Qt module.

From a maturity standpoint, it has been running as a playground project for 
several years now.  We have several platforms checked via our own CI, but would 
like to get coverage on all supported platforms and will certainly address any 
issues found.  Giuseppe D’Angelo was kind enough to add QtRO to the Qt LTS 
Coverity scans, and except for several issues tied to a copy of moc, it is in 
good shape.  It supports qmake docs, although the docs need some care and 
feeding (this is ok for a Tech Preview as I understand it).

If this request is well received, I do have one sub-request.  According to 
http://wiki.qt.io/Creating_a_new_module_or_tool_for_Qt, “the playground name 
needs to be changed to a descriptive Qt module or tool name.”  The current name 
is qtremoteobjects.  Are there issues keeping this name?

Thanks for your consideration,
Brett
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to