On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:37:06PM +0000, J-P Nurmi wrote: > Early feedback from the CI system would be invaluable. > note that nowadays you can explicitly schedule CI runs on arbitrary pending changes. of course, that's not the only _possible_ reason for wanting a branch, but if it's the only _actual_ reason, then it may make sense to change the plan. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
- [Development] Branch request: wip/itemviews in qtdeclar... J-P Nurmi
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemviews in... Pierre-Yves Siret
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemview... J-P Nurmi
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/item... Mark Gaiser
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/item... Pierre-Yves Siret
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemviews in... Robin Burchell
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemview... J-P Nurmi
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/item... Robin Burchell
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemview... Edward Welbourne
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemviews in... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemview... J-P Nurmi
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/item... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/... Edward Welbourne
- Re: [Development] Branch request:... Edward Welbourne
- Re: [Development] Branch request:... Shawn Rutledge
- Re: [Development] Branch requ... Filippo Cucchetto
- Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemviews in... Shawn Rutledge