+1 for Mike Krus as Approver. > On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:11 AM, Sergio Martins <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2017-02-06 14:54, Alex Blasche wrote: >>> There were no objections and maintainer of a module implies approver, so >>> could >>> somebody do the honours and grant Mike the rights please? The necessary >>> period >>> has long since passed. >> I am sorry but being the maintainer does not imply approver rights. > > https://wiki.qt.io/The_Qt_Governance_Model kind of implies you can't be a > maintainer if you're not an approver. > "How to become a Maintainer: An Approver who (...), may be nomiated (...)" > > What failed here is that he wasn't nominated for approver, so we need to wait > in any case :) > > +1 for approver, from me. > > > Btw, the "maintainers" group in gerrit > (https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/admin/groups/13,members) seems out of > date, it's missing Sean, Bogdan, Giulio, Milian and possibly more. > > > > Regards, > -- > Sérgio Martins | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer > Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company > Tel: Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322) > KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
-- Jake Petroules - [email protected] The Qt Company - Silicon Valley Qbs build tool evangelist - qbs.io _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
