On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 02:54:53PM +0000, Alexander Blasche wrote: > >There were no objections and maintainer of a module implies approver, so > >could > >somebody do the honours and grant Mike the rights please? The necessary > >period > >has long since passed. > > I am sorry but being the maintainer does not imply approver rights. At most > it implies approver rights for the component he is maintainer for. I agree > that when you maintain a cross module component that this is somewhat harder > to manage. > selective approver rights are not implementable for a horizontal responsibility, so this is kind of moot.
> In any case I am sure that waiting for the required time does not make much > of a difference. Then this discussion is over anyway. > the previous thread already used the word approver without futher qualification (http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-August/026909.html) and nobody objected, so i just gave mike the rights. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
