15.02.2017, 13:39, "Jani Heikkinen" <[email protected]>:
> Hi all,
>
> As you know we need to optimize our systems to be able to keep our plans in 
> the future. In CI side we are handling at least 4 different branches at same 
> time. Releasing side we should be able to do many releases/snapshots 
> parallel, test those releases/snapshots parallel etc. And all this needs lots 
> of hw capasity (both calculating power & disc space).
>
> We are trying to analyze the places where to do optimization and one place is 
> our src package creation and delivery: At the moment we are doing, testing & 
> delivering single src packages + separate submodule src packages, all these 
> with .zip, .7z, .tar.gz & .tar.xz! Huge amount of src 
> packages/snapshot/release. And currently doing these both for enterprise and 
> lgpl! In the future (5.10?) we should be able to use unified ones meaning no 
> separate LGPL & enterprise ones.
>
> But I think we could also drop those less used ones(*) as well with quicker 
> schedule so I propose:
>
> From 5.9 -> let's start doing & delivering
>
> - One set of src packages with ẃindows line endings (.zip, both single one & 
> submodule specific, both enterprise and lgpl)
> - One set of src packages with unix line endings (.tar.gz, both single one & 
> submodule specific, both enterprise and lgpl)

Why not use most efficient compression formats instead, i.e. keep 7z and tar.xz 
only?

>
> br,
> Jani
>
> *:Download statistic:
> .7z 7%
> .tar.gz 44%
> .tar.xz 12%
> .zip 37%
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to