Em segunda-feira, 6 de março de 2017, às 23:32:42 CET, Jake Petroules escreveu: > > Yes, we do. We've had that dependency for 15 years. > > And it will go away once Qt moves to Qbs as its default build system in Qt > 6.
There has been no discussion of qbs. Therefore, there is no decision on what ot use for Qt 6. It might be cmake or qmake. But if we do use a tool that is not part of Qt's sources, it would be nice to use one that does support generating the headers. I don't find it likely to find a generator that will allow the powerful scanning that syncqt.pl does, unless like syncqt.pl it is actually a fully-featured language with an extensive library. Like Scons (which I'd hate to use, but at this point it is a contender just as likely). > >> On later steps qt is built pretty good without any serious issues. > >> > >> Is there any attempts to rewrite syncqt.pl in c++? > > > > No. > > > It will be "rewritten" (although the replacement will not be a direct > translation) in JavaScript when Qt moves to Qbs. Or a cmake script or a Python routine in Scons. Or left as-is. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
