André Pönitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Qt was prioritizing application developer convenience over raw performance, > making it easier for an application developers to create something working > in reasonable time. That included features like consistency in the API > and naming in general that made it possible to transfer knowledge of one > part of the API to another. This also included recommendations for "one > size fits all" usage patterns including default choices for containers.
Why are you speaking "in the past"?... Is there a consensus that raw performance should now prime over developer convenience? Philippe _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
