On quinta-feira, 23 de março de 2017 00:32:14 PDT Olivier Goffart wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have been wondering if we should enhance Qt container with member > functions to help using some of the standard algorithm. > a peace of code is better than many words. We would be able to do: [cut]
I like the initiative, but the commenters have a good point to about free functions. We can probably find a balance between them, which functions are so common that should be members, and which ones we ought to leave free. If you can start throwing the idea around and see what you can come up with, we'll take it step-by-step. If not, let's have some time for this during QtCS later this year. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
