On 2017-03-31, 9:17 AM, "Development on behalf of James McDonnell" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
> > >On 2017-03-31, 9:09 AM, "Development on behalf of Ville Voutilainen" ><[email protected] on behalf of >[email protected]> wrote: > >>On 31 March 2017 at 15:48, Lars Knoll <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Rafael, >>> >>> I¹d agree with you that it¹s too early to drop QNX 6.6, even though I >>>understand that people would want to drop gcc 4.7. Is there a chance QNX >>>6.6 will get a toolchain update at some point? >> >> >>Seems unlikely. >>http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34168433/am-i-able-to-use-c11-in-qnx >>Based on that, I get a tingling feeling that it's possible to update >>the toolchain but QNX deems that experimental, >>which is a probable turn-off for conservative customers. > >An official GCC update for QNX 6.6.0 is very unlikely. Oh, and some of the problems are library problems; e.g., constexpr and initializer lists. A constexpr fix is even less likely than a GCC update. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
