On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:56:53AM +0200, Marc Mutz wrote: > On Friday 31 March 2017 09:43:18 Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > 31.03.2017, 10:38, "Marc Mutz" <[email protected]>: > [...] > > > [1] even better than Qt's, these days, since cppreference.com > > > clearly shows what's available in which C++ version while Qt hides > > > all but the latest documentation, which only describes the current > > > state of affairs. > > > > Each Qt release is shipped with documentation. > > That doesn't help if you develop software that's supposed to be > compatible with multiple Qt versions. Even if you install all Qt > releases, the fact that you have separate documents per version makes > finding past changes very hard. > > > Also, there is \since. > > But no \until. I try to put this in the docs, and sometimes I > succeeded, but I've also been -1ed for trying already.
Funnily enough I never caught you trying that. But sure, removing convenience from Qt by itself is -1-worthy, as is trying to set up infrastructure to allow that. > Thanks, You are welcome. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
