On Thursday 06 April 2017 08:26:54 Lars Knoll wrote: > > On 05 Apr 2017, at 17:51, Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:06:09AM +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > >> There's been a fair amount of talk about QList's future, so I'm curious: > > so, now that the thread has finally died down, who volunteers to > > summarize is conclusions (and controversies) in a QUIP? i wouldn't want > > to actually read the 150 mails i skipped. > > Agree with Ossi. Summarising this in a QUIP would be very helpful, and > reviewing that will hopefully then bring everybody on the same page.
IMO, There's no point in QUIPing this, yet, because while there's consensus to remove QList in the current form from Qt 6 APIs, there's no general exit strategy. I outlined one, but I don't feel it has gained anything near consensus, and no counter-proposals have been forthcoming. Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <[email protected]> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
